OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Valdez v. Herrera

Case Information

Date Filed: July 9, 2009
State: New Mexico
Issue: Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico (Case 1:09-cv-00668-LAM-DJS); U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit (Case 11-2063)

Issue:

Whether a New Mexico statute, requiring voter registration to be offered when an individual renews a drivers license or state-issued identification card, has been violated.

Status:

Order Denying Emergency Motion for Certificate of Appealability entered 1/25/11.  Order to Show Cause entered 2/3/11.  Order Granting Joint Motion to Continue Trial entered 2/8/11.  Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Order filed 2/17/. Notice of Appeal filed 3/25/11.  USCA Case Number 11-2063 in 10th Circuit entered 3/30/11.  Notice or Record Now Complete/ Appellant Brief 5/23 entered 4/12/11. Notice of Referral to Mediation Conferencing entered 4/19/11.

Federal Appellate Court Documents

Federal District Court Documents

 

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test

Edward B. Foley

A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

This is why US election ballots routinely go missing

Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in USA Today about the prevalence of missing election ballots.

 

"Most of the time, it just goes unreported because it doesn't affect the result," Tokaji said. 


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Finds Partisan Gerrymandering Claims to be Non-Justiciable Political Questions

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion on Thursday determining that claims of partisan gerrymandering are political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts. The opinion resolved disputes originating in North Carolina and Maryland, in the cases of Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek.

more info & analysis...