Last Updated: July 22, 2011 at 12:52 PM
Texas Democratic Party v. Vasquez
Case Information
Date Filed / Ended: November 10, 2008 / November 2, 2009
State: Texas
Issue: Provisional Ballots
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Case 4:08-cv-03332)
Issue:
Whether the unlawful actions of the defendant resulted in provisional and mail-in ballots not being counted before the state statutory deadline.
Status:
Conditional Order of Dismissal 11/2/09. Complaint filed 9/2/10.
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 11/10/08) - ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons
(entered 11/10/08) - Application for TRO, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction
(filed 11/10/08)
- Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gray H. Miller. MOTION HEARING held on 11/12/2008. Oral argument heard; DENYING AS MOOT as stated on the record MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (entered 11/12/08)
- EMERGENCY MOTION by Texas Democratic Party, et al.
(filed 11/14/08)
- ORDER Denying Emergency Motion to Preserve and Produce Evidence
(entered 11/14/08) - CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Texas Democratic Party, et al.
(filed 11/18/08) - CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Paul Bettencourt
(filed 12/1/08) - First AMENDED Complaint
(filed 12/1/08) - ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Paul Bettencourt
(filed 12/9/08) - SCHEDULING ORDER
(entered 12/17/08) - REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting
(filed 12/17/08) - Defendant's Initial Disclosures
(filed 12/19/08) - MOTION Plaintiffs' Unopposed Application for a District Court of Three Judges
(filed 12/19/08)
- ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion for a District Court of Three Judges
(entered 12/22/08) - Plaintiff's MOTION to Expand the Number of Interrogatories
(filed 12/31/08)
- Defendant's RESPONSE to Plaintiff's Motion to Expand the Number of Interrogatories
(filed 1/9/09)
- INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Texas Democratic Party, et al.
(filed 1/9/09) - ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion to Expand the Number of Interrogatories
(entered 1/13/09) - Discovery Hearing set for 3/9/09 (entered 3/5/09)
- Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Motion for Definite Statement and Request for Oral Hearing filed by Bettencourt
(filed 3/9/09) - Discovery Hearing reset for 3/18/09 (entered 3/9/09)
- Deadlines Terminated (entered 3/13/09)
- ORDER setting Discovery Hearing for 5/28/09
(entered 5/22/09) - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gray H. Miller. DISCOVERY CONFERENCE held on 5/28/2009. Plaintiffs seek information and documents associated with approximately 70,000 rejected voter registration application and the people removed from voter registration rolls over the past two years (both at regular purge intervals and otherwise timed). Defendants are to determine and provide the total number of documents associated with (1) the rejected applications and (2) the removals. Based on these figures, defendants are to calculate and provide estimated production costs (including redaction costs) and/or suggest an alternative means of production (e.g. via filtered computer access) and cost associated with the alternative means. The document volume and cost information is to be provided to the court on or before 6/11/09. After the information has been provided the court will schedule a hearing to address the production, unless the parties are able to otherwise agree. (entered 5/29/09)
- Response to Court's Minute Entry
(filed 6/11/09)
- Response to Court's Minute Entry
- Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Response and Response to Defendant's Report re:Discovery Hearing
(filed 6/11/09) - Reply to Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Response to Defendant's Report
(filed 6/22/09) - Supplement filed by Paul Bettencourt
(filed 7/1/09) - Proposed Order
(filed 7/8/09) - ORDER, denying plaintiff's motion to compel unlimited access to defendant's databases.
(entered 7/16/09) - Motion to Quash Subpoena
(filed 8/26/09) - Response
(filed 8/31/09) - Reply to Response
(filed 8/31/09) - Supplement filed by Bettencourt
(filed 9/8/09) - Motion for Entering of Order
(filed 9/10/09) - Motion to Amend Scheduling Order and Request for Expedited Ruling
(filed 9/10/09)
- Amended Motion to Amend
(filed 9/10/09)
- Amended Motion to Amend
- Response to Motion to Enter Scheduling Order
(filed 9/10/09) - Motion to Compel Testimony of Ed Johnson
(filed 9/10/09) - Order Setting Hearing on Motions
(entered 9/11/09) - Response to Motion to Compel Testimony
(filed 9/15/09)
- Amended Response
(filed 9/15/09)
- Amended Response
- Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gray H. Miller. MOTION HEARING held on 9/17/2009 DENYING AS MOOT MOTION to Compel Testimony of Ed Johnson, GRANTING MOTION for Entry of Order, DENYING Amended MOTION to Amend, DENYING MOTION to Amend. The parties will agree on mediators and dates. A new scheduling order will be entered after the conclusion of the mediation. (entered 9/17/09)
- Order substituting Leo Vasquez for Paul Bettencourt as party Defendant
(entered 10/6/09) - Conditional Order of Dismissal
(entered 11/2/09)
_____________________________________________________
- Complaint
(filed 9/2/10)
- Letter from Chad Dunn Regarding Mediation
(filed 9/2/10) - Letter from Chad Dunn Regarding the Lack of Need for a Hearing
(filed 9/8/10) - Motion to Dismiss or Affirm filed by appellee Texas Democratic Party (filed 6/22/11)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...