Major Pending Cases
- See All Pending Cases
- See All Archived Cases
- A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio v. LaRose
- Anderson v. Raffensperger
- Arizona Democratic Party v. Hobbs
- Arizona Republican Party v. Democratic National Committee
- Black Votes Matter Fund v. Raffensperger
- Bruni v. Hughs
- Common Cause v. Kemp
- Crossey v. Boockvar
- Daunt v. Benson
- Democracy North Carolina v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
- Democratic National Committee v. Bostelmann
- Drenth v. Boockvar
- Ebenezer Baptist Church v. Raffensperger
- Edwards v. Vos
- Gallagher v. New York State Board of Elections
- Gary v. Virginia Department of Elections
- Gear v. Knudson
- Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda v. Raffensperger
- Gilby v. Hughs
- Gloria v. Hughs
- Hoffard v. Cochise
- Jacobson v. Lee
- Jones v. DeSantis
- Judicial Watch v. Pennsylvania
- League of Women Voters of Michigan v. Benson
- League of Women Voters of Ohio v. LaRose
- League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar
- League of Women Voters of Virginia v. Virginia State Board of Elections
- Lewis v. Hughs
- Luft v. Evers
- Mecinas v. Hobbs
- New Georgia Project v. Raffensperger
- Nielsen v. DeSantis
- People First of Alabama v. Merrill
- Priorities USA v. Nessel
- S.P.S. ex rel. Short v. Raffensperger
- Stringer v. Cascos
- Swenson v. Bostelmann
- Texas Democratic Party v. Abbott
- Texas Democratic Party v. Hughs
- The Andrew Goodman Foundation v. Bostelmann
- Thompson v. DeWine
- Trump v. Boockvar
- Trump v. Cegavske
- Voto Latino Inc. v. Hobbs
Election Law Litigation
Summit County Democratic Central and Executive Committee, et al v. Blackwell, et al
(page last updated October 31, 2007 at 8:56 AM)
Case Information
All Courts: U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio (Case 5:04-cv-02165-JRA); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Case 04-4311)
Topic(s): Polling Place Challenges
State: Ohio
Date Filed: October 28, 2004
Date Ended: November 2, 2004
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 10/28/2004) - Motion for temporary restraining order filed by all plaintiffs (filed 10/28/2004)
- Memorandum in support of plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order filed by all plaintiffs
- Notice of Hearing
- Motion to intervene as a party of Challengers filed by Matthew Heider, Sam Ewing, Elizabeth Coombe and David Timms (filed 10/29/2004)
- Proposed Intervenors' Opposition to Motion for temporary restraining order filed by Matthew Heider, Sam Ewing, Elizabeth Coombe and David Timms (filed 10/29/2004)
- Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order. It is granted to the extent persons appointed as challengers may not be present at the polling place for the sole purpose of challenging the qualifications of other voters. The motion is denied as to all other requests for relief. Signed by Judge John R. Adams on 10/31/04 (filed 10/31/2004)
- Notice of Appeal by Elizabeth Coombe, Sam Ewing, Matthew Heider, David Timms (filed 11/01/2004)
- Order denying intervening challengers Motion to stay execution of judgment pending appeal Signed by Judge John R. Adams on 11/1/04 (filed 11/01/2004)
- Response /opposition to intervenors motion to stay execution of judgment pending appeal filed by all plaintiffs
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant State of Ohio's Response to Request for Brief
- Consolidated opinion for both Spencer and Summit County
- Consolidated concurrence for both Spencer and Summit County
- Consolidated dissent for both Spencer and Summit County
- Justice Stevens' Opinion
Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.
The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631
If you have trouble accessing this page or need to request an alternate format, please email the Moritz Law Webmaster
PDF files in this site may require Adobe Reader to view (link opens in new window)