Last Updated: September 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM
South Carolina Green Party v. South Carolina State Election Commission
Case Information
Date Filed: August 7, 2008
State: South Carolina
Issue: Ballot Access
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District for District of South Carolina (Case 3:08-cv-02790)
Issue:
Whether South Carolina law, which provides that a candidate that seeks a nomination from multiple parties will be banned from appearing on the ballot if any one of those parties rejects his candidacy, violates the U.S. Constitution.
Status:
Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 8/7/08. Motion to Intervene filed by the Charleston County Democratic Party on 8/22/08. Response to Motion for Prelminary Injunction filed 8/25/08. Answer filed on 8/28/08.
Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 8/7/08) - Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories
(filed 8/7/08) - Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 8/7/08)
- MOTION to Intervene by Charleston County Democratic Party
(filed 8/22/08)
- Exhibit A - Answer of Intervenor

- Exhibit B - Memo Opp to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

- Exhibit 1 - Johnson Circuit Court Order

- Exhibit 2 - Statement of Intention of Candidacy

- Exhibit 3 - Notice of Candidacy and Pledge

- Exhibit 4 - Official Primary Results

- Exhibit 5 - S.C. Green Party Website Article dated 7/1/08

- Exhibit A - Answer of Intervenor
- RESPONSE in Opposition to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 8/25/08)
- SUPPLEMENT by South Carolina Green Party
(filed 8/26/08)
- ANSWER to Complaint
(filed 8/28/08) - Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories
(filed 8/28/08) - CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER
(entered 9/4/08) - REPLY to Response to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 9/5/08) - NOTICE of Hearing on MOTION for Preliminary Injunction : Motion Hearing tentatively set for 9/18/2008 (entered 9/8/08)
- RESPONSE in Opposition to MOTION to Intervene
(filed 9/9/08) - RESPONSE in Support of MOTION to Intervene
(filed 9/9/08) - SUPPLEMENT by South Carolina Green Party
(filed 9/11/08)
- REPLY to Response to MOTION to Intervene
(filed 9/11/08) - Additional Attachments to MOTION to Intervene
(filed 9/12/08)
- SUR REPLY to REPLY to Response to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 9/12/08) - NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING - Motion Hearing on 9/18/2008 at 2:00 cancelled and rescheduled to 9/18/2008 01:30 PM (entered 9/16/08)
- SUPPLEMENT by South Carolina State Election Commission
(filed 9/18/08)
- Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie: denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction; granting Motion to Intervene as orally stated on the record.
(entered 9/18/08) - Exhibit List
(filed 9/18/08) - NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings (filed 10/6/08)
- Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charleston County Democratic Party
(filed 10/8/08) - Rule 26(f) Report
(filed 10/8/08)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...