Major Pending Cases
- See All Pending Cases
- See All Archived Cases
- A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio v. LaRose
- Anderson v. Raffensperger
- Arizona Democratic Party v. Hobbs
- Arizona Republican Party v. Democratic National Committee
- Black Votes Matter Fund v. Raffensperger
- Bruni v. Hughs
- Common Cause v. Kemp
- Crossey v. Boockvar
- Daunt v. Benson
- Democracy North Carolina v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
- Democratic National Committee v. Bostelmann
- Drenth v. Boockvar
- Ebenezer Baptist Church v. Raffensperger
- Edwards v. Vos
- Gallagher v. New York State Board of Elections
- Gary v. Virginia Department of Elections
- Gear v. Knudson
- Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda v. Raffensperger
- Gilby v. Hughs
- Gloria v. Hughs
- Hoffard v. Cochise
- Jacobson v. Lee
- Jones v. DeSantis
- Judicial Watch v. Pennsylvania
- League of Women Voters of Michigan v. Benson
- League of Women Voters of Ohio v. LaRose
- League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar
- League of Women Voters of Virginia v. Virginia State Board of Elections
- Lewis v. Hughs
- Luft v. Evers
- Mecinas v. Hobbs
- New Georgia Project v. Raffensperger
- Nielsen v. DeSantis
- People First of Alabama v. Merrill
- Priorities USA v. Nessel
- S.P.S. ex rel. Short v. Raffensperger
- Stringer v. Cascos
- Swenson v. Bostelmann
- Texas Democratic Party v. Abbott
- Texas Democratic Party v. Hughs
- The Andrew Goodman Foundation v. Bostelmann
- Thompson v. DeWine
- Trump v. Boockvar
- Trump v. Cegavske
- Voto Latino Inc. v. Hobbs
Election Law Litigation
Meehan v. Philadelphia Board of Commissioners
(page last updated October 22, 2007 at 10:31 AM)
Case Information
All Courts: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Case )
Topic(s): Absentee Ballots
State: Pennsylvania
Date Filed: November 2, 2004
Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 11/2/2004)
Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.
The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631
If you have trouble accessing this page or need to request an alternate format, please email the Moritz Law Webmaster
PDF files in this site may require Adobe Reader to view (link opens in new window)