Last Updated: November 28, 2018 at 8:41 PM
Barber et al. v. Bennett
Case Information
Date Filed: November 24, 2014
State: Arizona
Issue:
Courts that Heard this Case: (Case )
Date Filed: November 30, -0001
State: Arizona
Issues: Provisional Ballots, Early Voting, Redistricting
Courts that Heard this Case: District of Arizona (Case 14-cv-02489)
Issue:
Whether election officials handling of early ballots and provisional ballots violates the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Status:
Complaint filed 11/24/14. Motion for Preliminary Injunction and TRO filed 11/24/14. McSally's Response in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 11/25/14. McSally's Motion to Dismiss filed 11/25/14. Defendant's Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 11/25/14. Order denying 11/27/14. Answer filed 12/11/14. Stipulation of Dismissal filed 2/18/15. Order pursuant to Stipulation to Dismiss filed 2/20/15.
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 11/24/14) - Plaintiff's Motion for TRO
(filed 11/24/14)
- Martha McSally's Motion to Intervene
(filed 11/25/14) - McSally's Response to Motion for TRO
(filed 11/25/14) - McSally's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 11/25/14)
- Defendant's Response to Motion for TRO
(filed 11/25/14)
- Defendant's Notice of Joinder with McSally's Response
(filed 11/25/14)
- Defendant's Joinder with McSally's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 11/25/14) - Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Intervene
(filed 11/25/14) - Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 11/25/14) - Plaintiff's Reply to Response to Motion to TRO
(filed 11/25/14) - McSally's Reply to Response to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 11/26/14)
- Order denying Application
(filed 11/27/14) - Answer
(filed 12/11/14) - Plaintiffs' Stipulation of Dismissal
(filed 2/18/15) - Order pursuant to Stipulation of Dismissal
(filed 2/20/15)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...