Last Updated: August 13, 2014 at 8:37 AM
Texas v. Holder
Case Information
Date Filed: January 24, 2012
State: Texas
Issues: Voting Rights Act, Voter ID
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:12-cv-00128); United States Supreme Court (Case 12-1028)
Issue:
Whether Texas' voter ID law should be granted preclearance under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
Status:
Complaint Filed 1/24/12. Answer filed 4/9/12. Trial commenced 7/10/12. Opinion Denying Texas' Request for a Declaratory Judgment on Count One issued 8/30/12. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 10/1/12. Order entering final judgment on claim one filed 12/17/12. Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court filed 12/19/12. Lawyer's Committee Motion to Affirm filed 5/9/13. DOJ's Motion to Affirm filed 5/9/13. Rodriguez Intervenor's Motion to Affirm filed 5/9/13. Judgment Vacated and Remanded in light of Shelby County v. Holder filed 6/27/13. Case dismissed on 8/27/13. Order denying Kennie-Intervenros' Motion for Attorney's Fees filed 8/11/14.
Supreme Court Documents
- Texas' Jurisdictional Statement
(filed 2/19/13) - Lawyer's Committee's Motion to Affirm
(filed 5/9/13) - DOJ's Motion to Affirm
(filed 5/9/13) - Rodriguez Intervenor's Motion to Affirm
(filed 5/9/13) - Distributed for Conference (filed 6/25/13)
- Judgment Vacated and Remanded in light of Shelby County v. Holder (filed 6/27/13)
- Judgment issued (filed 7/29/13)
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 1/24/12) - Proposed Intervenors' Answers
(filed 2/23/12) - Answer to Complaint by Texas NAACP and MALC
(filed 3/15/12) - Amended Complaint
(filed 3/15/12) - Answer to first Amended Complaint
(filed 3/22/12) - Motion for Protective Order Regarding Legislative Privilege
(filed 3/22/12) - US Motion for Protective Order
(filed 3/27/12) - Answer to Amended Complaint by NAACP
(filed 3/29/12) - Response to US' Motion for Protective Order
(filed 3/29/12) - Joint Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order
(filed 3/29/12) - Defendant's Response in Opposition to Protective Order
(filed 3/29/12) - Joint Memorandum in Support of US' Motion for Protective Order
(filed 3/29/12) - Protective Order
(filed 3/30/12) - Texas' Reply on Legislative Privilege
(filed 4/2/12) - Answer to Complaint
(filed 4/9/12) - US' Opposition to Legislative Protection
(filed 4/10/12) - Notice on Production of Legislative History
(filed 4/11/12) - Answer of Defendant-Intervenors
(filed 4/13/12) - Proposed Answer of Defendant-Intervors
(filed 4/13/12) - Proposed Answer of Defendant to First Amended Complaint
(filed 4/13/12) - Motion in Favor of Protective Order
(filed 4/13/12) - Kennie's Answer to First Amended Complaint
(filed 4/19/12) - Order Denying Motion for Protective Order
(filed 4/20/12) - Notice of Legislative Privelege Order
(filed 4/24/12) - Texas' Response to Motion to Continue Trial
(filed 4/27/12) - Texas' Response to Motion to Compel
(filed 4/30/12) - Holder's Motion for Protective Order
(filed 5/3/12) - Memo in Support of Motion to Compel
(filed 5/3/12) - Response to Protective Order
(filed 5/11/12) - Declaration of Dr. Gary King
(filed 5/11/12) - Protective Order
(filed 5/17/12) - Texas' Advisory Concerning Discovery Requests
(filed 5/18/12) - Attorney General's Motion for Protective Order
(filed 5/18/12) - Order Compelling Texas to Properly Assert Privilege
(filed 5/21/12) - Texas' Motion to Compel Interrogatories and Supporting Memorandum
(filed 5/21/12) - Texas' Advisory Notice on Lt. Gov. Dewhurst's Deposition
(filed 5/21/12) - Texas' Motion for Protective Order
(filed 5/21/12) - Holder's Motion for Protective Order
(filed 5/21/12) - Defendant-Intervenor's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Deposition Testimony
(filed 5/21/12) - Holder's Motion to Compel Production of Testimony and Documents
(filed 5/21/12)
- Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Holder's Motion to Compel
(filed 5/21/12) - Attorney General's Proposed Order Compelling Production
(filed 5/21/12) - Beuck Deposition
(filed 5/21/12) - Fraser Deposition
(filed 5/21/12) - Harless Deposition
(filed 5/21/12) - McCoy Deposition
(filed 5/21/12) - United States' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents
(filed 5/21/12) - Texas' Response to First Set of Requests for Production of Documents
(filed 5/21/12) - Revised Privilege Logs
(filed 5/21/12) - Harless Documents
(filed 5/21/12) - Dewhurst Documents
(filed 5/21/12) - Objection Letter
(filed 5/21/12) - Busbee Docket
(filed 5/21/12) - Busbee Order
(filed 5/21/12) - Contested Privilege Index
(filed 5/21/12) - Waivers
(filed 5/21/12) - Sweeten email
(filed 5/21/12) - Texas' ROG Response
(filed 5/21/12) - Dewhurst Release
(filed 5/21/12)
- Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Holder's Motion to Compel
- Order on Motion to Clarify
(filed 5/22/12) - Updated Privilege Logs
(filed 5/23/12) - Holder Deposition Withdrawal Notice
(filed 5/24/12) - Order on Motion for Protective Order
(filed 5/24/12) - Holder's Notice that Texas' Latest Privilege Logs Were Produced After Discovery Deadline
(filed 5/24/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Response to Motion to Compel and Cross Motion for Protective Order
(filed 5/24/12) - Holder's Memorandum Opposing Motion to Compel Federal Non-Party Agencies
(filed 5/24/12) - Response in Opposition to Defendant and Defendant-Intervenors' Motions to Compel
(filed 5/24/12) - Attorney General's Notice of Compliance with Court Order
(filed 5/25/12) - Attorney General's Motion to Compel the Production of TES Documents
(filed 5/25/12) - Texas' Notice of Compliance with Court Order
(filed 5/26/12) - Court Order on Discovery Disputes
(filed 5/28/12) - Defendant-Intervenor's Reply Memorandum in Support of Attorney General's Motion to Compel
(filed 5/29/12) - Attorney General's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel
(filed 5/29/12)
- Texas v. U.S. Transcript
(filed 5/29/12) - Election Code Cases Spreadsheet
(filed 5/29/12) - Harless Website
(filed 5/29/12) - Al Dia Article (Spanish)
(filed 5/29/12) - Texas Watchdog Article
(filed 5/29/12) - Texas GOP Interview
(filed 5/29/12)
- Texas v. U.S. Transcript
- Texas' Reply in Support of Motion to Compel
(filed 5/29/12) - Texas' Reply to Defendant-Intervenor's Response to Motion to Compel
(filed 5/29/12) - Attorney General's Motion to Seal Exhibit
(filed 5/29/12) - Reply Memorandum in Support of Attorney General's May 25 Motion to Compel
(filed 5/30/12) - Plaintiffs Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
(filed 5/31/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
(filed 6/1/12) - Holder's Motion to Compel
(filed 6/5/12) - Court Order on Motions to Compel
(filed 6/5/12) - Holder's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
(filed 6/5/12) - Holder's Motion to Modify May 7 Scheduling Order
(filed 6/5/12) - Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
(filed 6/6/12) - Holder's Notice of Correction
(filed 6/6/12) - Defendant-Intervenor's Response to Holder's Motion to Modify
(filed 6/7/12) - Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
(filed 6/7/12) - Court Order on Motion to Compel
(filed 6/7/12) - Response in Opposition to Holder's Motion to Compel Dewhurst Deposition
(filed 6/7/12) - Holder's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Dewhurst Deposition
(filed 6/8/12) - Response in Opposition to Holder's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
(filed 6/8/12) - Court Order on Texas' Motion to Compel
(filed 6/8/12) - Holder's Reply in Support of Motion to Modify
(filed 6/11/12) - Motion to Withdraw Brianna Williams as Defendant-Intervenor
(filed 6/11/12) - Texas' Motion for Protective Order
(filed 6/13/12) - Court Order Resolving Scheduling Disputes
(filed 6/13/12) - Holder's Memorandum in Opposition to Texas' Motion for a Protective Order
(filed 6/14/12) - Court Order on Motion to Compel Deposition of Lt. Gov.
(filed 6/14/12) - Reply to Holder's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order
(filed 6/14/12) - Order on Texas' Motion for a Protective Order
(filed 6/15/12) - Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Modify
(filed 6/18/12) - Plaintiff's Legislative Privilege Motion in Limine
(filed 6/20/12) - Plaintiff's Newly Disclosed Witnesses Motion in Limine
(filed 6/20/12) - Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Allan J. Lichtman
(filed 6/20/12) - Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude an Adverse Inference Based on Assertion of Legislative Prvilege
(filed 6/20/12) - Notice of Plaintiff's Live Witness List
(filed 6/20/12) - Plaintiff's Motion in Limine on Subjective Intent of Individual Legislators
(filed 6/20/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Notice of Intended Witness Testimony
(filed 6/20/12) - Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to Defendant-Intervenors
(filed 6/20/12) - Holder's Notice of Trial Witnesses
(filed 6/20/12) - Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of J. Morgan Kousser
(filed 6/20/12) - Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
(filed 6/20/12) - State Voter Registration Instructions
(filed 6/20/12) - Prior Court Opinions
(filed 6/20/12) - Court Opinions and Expert Declarations
(filed 6/20/12) - Survey and Depositions
(filed 6/20/12) - Depositions
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Journal
(filed 6/20/12) - Voter Fraud Cases
(filed 6/20/12) - Texas' Joint Appendix
(filed 6/20/12)
- Legislative History of Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Floor Discussion of Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Minutes
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Hearing
(filed 6/20/12) - Consideration of Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Continued Consideration of Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Final Text of Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Discussion of Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Continued Senate Discussion of Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Voter Fraud Hearning
(filed 6/20/12) - Voter Fraud Hearing Part II
(filed 6/20/12) - House Journal
(filed 6/20/12) - House Floor Debate
(filed 6/20/12) - House Committee on Elections
(filed 6/20/12) - List of Amendments Offered
(filed 6/20/12) - Marked-up Bill
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Minutes and Witness List
(filed 6/20/12) - Transcript of Senate Proceedings
(filed 6/20/12) - Continued Transcript of Senate Proceedings
(filed 6/20/12) - Transcript of Senate Proceedings Part 3
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Journal and Demographic Data
(filed 6/20/12) - Demographic Data and Voter ID Locations
(filed 6/20/12) - Analysis of Effects of Photo ID on Voter Turnout in Indiana
(filed 6/20/12) - Commission on Federal Election Reform
(filed 6/20/12) - Commission on Federal Election Reform Continued
(filed 6/20/12) - FEC Letter and Advisory Opinions
(filed 6/20/12) - Memos, Articles and Data on Voter Fraud
(filed 6/20/12) - Voter Registration Applications
(filed 6/20/12) - Certified Mail Receipts
(filed 6/20/12) - Crawford v. Marion County Election Board
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Floor Debate
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Hearing
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Hearing Volume 2
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Hearing Volume 3
(filed 6/20/12) - Texas House Committee on Elections
(filed 6/20/12) - Texas House Committee on Elections Volume 2
(filed 6/20/12) - Texas House Committee on Elections Volume 3
(filed 6/20/12) - Hearing Volume 4
(filed 6/20/12) - House Committee on Elections Hearing
(filed 6/20/12) - House Floor Debate
(filed 6/20/12) - House Journal
(filed 6/20/12) - Senate Journal
(filed 6/20/12) - HB 1706 Floor Discussion
(filed 6/20/12)
- Legislative History of Bill
- Motion to Extend Deadline to Exclude Expert Testimony
(filed 6/20/12) - Holder's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Major Forrest Mitchell
(filed 6/20/12) - Notice of Plaintiff's Affirmative Deposition Designations
(filed 6/20/12) - Request for Judicial Notice
(filed 6/21/12) - Holder's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Alan Sager
(filed 6/23/12) - Holder's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
(filed 6/25/12) - Notice of Trial Exhibit Index
(filed 6/25/12) - Opposition to Motion in Limine Concerning Allan J. Lichtman
(filed 6/25/12) - Opposition to Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Based on Legislative Privilege
(filed 6/25/12) - Opposition to Motion in Limine to Exclude Witnesses Based on Legislative Privilege
(filed 6/25/12) - Opposition to Motion in Limine Based on Subjective Intent of Legislators
(filed 6/25/12) - Opposition to Motion in Limine to Exclude Major Mitchell
(filed 6/25/12) - Notice of Filing Supplement Including Case Law
(filed 6/25/12) - Holder's Opposition to Texas' Motion in Limine
(filed 6/25/12) - Holder's Opposition to Texas' Motion in Limine Based on Subjective Intent
(filed 6/25/12) - Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony of Debeauvoir and Pippins-Poole
(filed 6/25/12) - Holder's Memorandum Opposing Texas' Motion in Limine on Waiver of Legislative Privilege
(filed 6/25/12) - Holder's Opposition to Texas' Motion to Exclude Kousser
(filed 6/25/12) - Notice Concerning Agreement Between Parties
(filed 6/27/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Joint Request for Judicial Notice
(filed 6/27/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Response to Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact
(filed 6/27/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact
(filed 6/27/12)
- Appendix
(filed 6/27/12) - Affidavit, Data and Expert Reports
(filed 6/27/12) - Declaration, State Data and Passport Application
(filed 6/27/12) - Texas Legislature Testimony
(filed 6/27/12) - Demographic Data
(filed 6/27/12) - Citizen Letters on Voter ID
(filed 6/27/12) - Texas House Committee on Elections Interim Report 2008
(filed 6/27/12) - Texas Voting Data Background
(filed 6/27/12) - Media Coverage of Bill
(filed 6/27/12) - Correspondence on Bill
(filed 6/27/12)
- Appendix
- Notice of Stipulation
(filed 6/29/12) - Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine on Subjective Intent
(filed 6/29/12) - Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony by Newly Disclosed Witnesses
(filed 6/29/12) - Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Regarding Legislative Privilege
(filed 6/29/12) - Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence Protected by Legislative Privilege
(filed 6/29/12) - Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude J. Morgan Kousser
(filed 6/29/12) - Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Allan J. Lichtman
(filed 6/29/12) - Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine Regarding Major Mitchell
(filed 6/29/12) - Holder's Second Notice of Filing Trial Exhibits
(filed 6/30/12)
- Texas Driver's License Office Locations
(filed 6/30/12) - State Voter Identification Requirements
(filed 6/30/12) - List of Bills Passed by Texas' Legislature
(filed 6/30/12) - Governor's Communications on Voter ID
(filed 6/30/12) - Media Coverage
(filed 6/30/12) - Media Coverage Part 2
(filed 6/30/12) - Media Coverage Part 3
(filed 6/30/12) - Emails on Voter ID
(filed 6/30/12) - Voter Fraud Article
(filed 6/30/12) - Texas' House Committee Goals
(filed 6/30/12)
- Texas Driver's License Office Locations
- Plaintiff's Response to Defendant-Intervenors' Proposed Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law
(filed 7/1/12) - Plaintiff's Response to Holder's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
(filed 7/1/12) - Holder's Motion for Immediate Relief
(filed 7/2/12) - Plaintiff's Exhibit List
(filed 7/2/12) - Holder's Proposed Findings of Fact Concerning Expert Depositions
(filed 7/2/12) - Notice of Expert Deposition Designations
(filed 7/2/12)
- Absolabehere Deposition
(filed 7/2/12) - Flores Deposition
(filed 7/2/12) - Kousser Deposition
(filed 7/2/12) - Marker Deposition
(filed 7/2/12) - Sager Deposition Part 1
(filed 7/2/12) - Sager Deposition Part 2
(filed 7/2/12) - Shaw Deposition
(filed 7/2/12)
- Absolabehere Deposition
- Defendant-Intervenors' Exhibit List
(filed 7/2/12) - Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Immediate Relief
(filed 7/3/12) - Advisory Regarding Deposition Designations
(filed 7/3/12) - Holder's Second Request for Judicial Notice
(filed 7/3/12) - Reply Memorandum in Support of Holder's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
(filed 7/5/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Memorandum in Support of Defendant-Intervenors' Proposed Findings of Fact
(filed 7/5/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Reply to Plaintiff's Objections
(filed 7/5/12) - Holder's Reply to Texas' Counter-Designations
(filed 7/5/12) - Clarification of Reply in Support of Proposed Findings of Fact
(filed 7/6/12) - Texas' Response to Joint Request for Judicial Notice
(filed 7/6/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Reply in Support of their Joint Request for Judicial Notice
(filed 7/9/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Amended List of Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/12/12) - Transcript of Video Testimony of Senator Carlos Uresti
(filed 7/12/12) - Corrected Supplemental Expert Declaration of Thomas Sager
(filed 7/12/12) - Advisory Regarding Election Identification Certificates
(filed 7/12/12) - Rodriguez Intervenors' Advisory to the Court Clarifying the Documents Needed to Obtain an Election Identification Certificate
(filed 7/13/12) - Holder's Notice of Objections to Texas' Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/13/12) - Holder's Notice of Revised Trial Exhibit List
(filed 7/13/12) - Notice of Withdrawal of Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/16/12) - Holder's Eighth Notice of Filing Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/16/12) - Texas' Objections to Holder's Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/17/12) - Index of Texas' Revised Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/18/12) - Texas' Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/18/12) - Response to Plaintiff's Notice of Objections to Defendant-Intervenors' Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/19/12) - Holder's Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Trial Exhibits
(filed 7/26/12) - Holder's Response to Texas' Advisory Regarding Election Identification Certificates
(filed 7/26/12) - Notice of Recent Opinion Regarding Voter ID
(filed 8/3/12) - Notice of Recent District Court Decision on Third-Party Voter Registration
(filed 8/3/12) - Attorney General's Notice of Filing Section 5 Determination
(filed 8/20/12) - Opinion Denying Texas' Request for a Declaratory Judgment on Count One
(filed 8/30/12) - Order
(filed 8/30/12) - Notice of Filing Section 5 Determination
(filed 9/5/12) - Joint Report Regarding Proposed Schedule for Claim Two
(filed 9/12/12) - Attorney General's Notice of Filing of No-Determination Letter
(filed 9/12/12) - Scheduling Order
(filed 9/14/12) - Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Briefs
(filed 9/21/12) - Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 10/1/12) - Memorandum in Support of Defendant-Intervenors' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 10/22/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 10/22/12) - Holder's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 10/22/12) - Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 11/1/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Reply in Further Support of their Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 11/13/12) - Reply Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 11/13/12) - Order to Show Cause Not to Defer Case
(filed 11/16/12) - Notice Concerning Shelby County v. Holder
(filed 11/29/12) - Texas' Response to Show Cause Order
(filed 11/29/12) - Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment
(filed 11/30/12) - Defendant-Intervenors' Opposition to Texas's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment
(filed 12/14/12) - Holder's Response to Motion for Entry of Final Judgment
(filed 12/14/12) - Order Entering Final Judgment on Claim One
(filed 12/17/12) - Notice of Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court
(filed 12/19/12) - Unopposed Motion to Hold Filings of Attorney Fee Motions in Abeyance
(filed 12/21/12) - Notice of Appeal Filed with Supreme Court
(filed 2/22/13) - Notice of Decision in Shelby
(filed 7/25/13) - Certified Copy of SCOTUS Judgment
(filed 7/29/13) - Plaintiff Motion to Dismiss
(filed 8/8/13)
- Proposed Order Dismissing
(filed 8/8/13)
- Proposed Order Dismissing
- Rodrigues' Response to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 8/22/13) - Attorney General's Response to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 8/22/13) - Defendants' Response to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 8/22/13) - Order Dismissing Case
(filed 8/27/13) - Kennie Defendant-Intervener's Motion for Fees
(filed 9/10/13) - Advisory from Texas on Kennie's Motion for Fees
(filed 9/12/13) - Kennie Intervenors' Notice of Supplemental Authority
(filed 5/30/14)
- Memorandum and Order
(filed 8/11/14) - Order denying Kennie-Intervenors' Motion for Attorney's Fees
(filed 8/11/14)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...