Last Updated: January 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Project Vote v. Kelly
Case Information
Date Filed: July 22, 2009
State: Pennsylvania
Issues: Ballot Access, Voter Registration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Case 2:09-cv-00951)
Issue:
Whether a Pennslyvania statute forbiding the payment of persons to solicit voter registration violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Status:
Judgment Entered 7/27/11. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed 7/16/10. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Denied file 9/28/10. ACORN Dismissed as Plaintiff filed 11/04/10. Defendant's and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed 4/11/11. Briefs in Opposition filed 5/13/11.
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 7/22/09) - Defendant's
Answer to the Complaint
(filed 9/22/09) - Consent Agreement Dismissing Defendant Stephen A. Zappala Jr.
(filed 10/27/09) - Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint to Add Parties
(filed 4/15/10) - Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff ACORN's Motion to Amend the Complaint
(filed 4/29/10) - Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Amended Complaint
(filed 5/14/10) - Order of Court Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Add Parties
(filed 5/28/10) - First Amended Complaint
(filed 6/07/10) - Defendant Corbett's Answer to the First Amended Complaint
(filed 6/17/10) - Defendant Corbett's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
(filed 7/16/10) - Defendant Corbett's Brief in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
(filed 7/16/10) - Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
(filed 8/16/10) - Defendant Corbett's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
(filed 8/30/10) - Memorandum Opinion on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
(filed 9/28/10) - Stipulation to Voluntarily Dismiss Plaintiff ACORN
(filed 11/04/10) - Defendant's Movement for Summary Judgment
(filed 4/11/11) - Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 4/11/11) - Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts as to which there is no Genuine Issue
(filed 4/11/11) - Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 4/11/11) - Plaintiff's Concise Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 4/11/11) - Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 4/11/11) - Plaintiff's Appendix of Testimonial and Documentary Evidence
(filed 4/11/11) - Defendant's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 5/13/11) - Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Concise Statement of Undisputed Facts
(filed 5/13/11) - Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Facts
(filed 5/13/11) - Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 5/13/11) - Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 5/23/11) - Memoradum Opinion Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 7/27/11) - Order of Court Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
(filed 7/27/11) - Judgment entered in Favor of Defendant Kelly
(filed 7/27/11)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...