Last Updated: November 7, 2016 at 5:03 PM
Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Republican Party of Pennsylvania
Case Information
Date Filed: October 30, 2016
State: Pennsylvania
Issue: Voter Intimidation
Courts that Heard this Case: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Case 2:16-cv-05664-PD)
Issue:
Whether the actions of the Republican Party of Pennsylvania, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Roger J. Stone, Jr., and Stop the Steal Inc., are violating the Voting Rights Act and the Ku Klux Klan Act by intimidating minority voters. The plaintiffs request that the courts issue an order to stop "voter intimidation" and for Stone and Stop the Steal Inc. to stop certain activities such as exit polling.
Status:
Complaint filed 10/30/16. Order Denying Motion for Temporary Injunction and/or Preliminary Injunction filed 11/7/16. Case Voluntarily Dismissed 11/9/16.
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 10/30/16) - Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction
(filed 11/3/16) - Defendant Republican Party of Pennsylvania Response in Opposition
(filed 11/4/16) - Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum of Law
(filed 11/5/16) - Surreply of Defendant Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
(filed 11/6/16) - Defendant Republican Party of Pennsylvania's Motion to Dismiss and Objection to Proposed Order
(filed 11/6/16) - Declaration of Dawn L. Smalls
(filed 11/7/16) - Motion to Quash Subpoena
- Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Republican Party of Pennsylvania's Objections, Motion to Quash Subpoena, and Motion for Protective Order
(filed 11/7/16) - Order that Defendant's Objections, Motion to Quash Subpoena, and Motion for Protective Order are Granted
(filed 11/7/16) - Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion for Injunctive Relief
(filed 11/7/16) - Declaration of Defendant Roger J. Stone
(filed 11/7/16) - Declaration of Paul Rolf Jensen
(filed 11/7/16) - Declaration of Michael Gottlieb
(filed 11/7/16) - Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction
(filed 11/7/16)
- Memorandum
(filed 11/7/16)
- Memorandum


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...