Last Updated: July 19, 2012 at 11:26 AM
Marks v. Koch
Case Information
Date Filed: October 8, 2009
State: Colorado
Issues: Improper Election Administration, Freedom of Information
Courts that Heard this Case: Colorado Court of Appeals (Case 10CA1111); Colorado Supreme Court (Case No. 11SC816); Pitkin County District Court (Case 09CV294)
Issue:
Whether article VII, §8, of the Colorado Constitution prohibits making cast election ballots available for public inspection pursuant to the Colorado Open Records Act
Status:
Petition for Writ of Certiorari Granted by Colorado Supreme Court 4/16/12, subsequently denied 6/21/12. Petition of Certiorari to Colorado Supreme Court filed 11/9/11. Court of Appeals Decision Announced 9/29/11.
See related federal court case: Citizen Center v. Gessler
Pitkin County District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 10/8/09) - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Koch
(filed 11/6/09) - Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 12/1/09) - Defendant Koch's Disclosure of Expert Testimony
(filed 1/22/10) - Order dismissing complaint
(filed 3/10/10)
Colorado Court of Appeals Documents
- Brief of Appellant Marilyn Marks
(filed 10/19/10) - Answer Brief of Appellee Kathryn Koch
(filed 11/30/10) - Addendum to Appellee's Answer Brief
(filed 11/30/10) - Opinion Reversing and Remanding Judgment
(filed 9/29/11)
Colorado Supreme Court Documents
- Petition for Writ of Certiorari
(filed 11/9/11) - Petition Granted
(filed 4/16/12) - Petition Denied as Improvidently Granted
(filed 6/21/12) - Petition for Rehearing Denied
(filed 7/16/12)
Related News Articles
-
City files appeal to high court over ballot ruling (11/12/11)
- Ballot transparency a statewide debate (11/28/11)
- State high court to review Aspen ballot-images case (4/17/12)
- Marks prevails in lawsuit over Aspen election ballots: State Supreme Court won't hear appeal after all (6/28/12)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...