HTTP 404 Not Found

OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

League of Women Voters Of Ohio v. Larose

Case Information

Date Filed: November 30, -0001
State: Ohio
Issue: Improper Election Administration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court For The Southern District Of Ohio (Case 2:20-cv-01638)

Issue:

 Plaintiffs challenge the standards for the delayed primary created by the enactment of House Bill 197 (“H.B. 197”), including the refusal to extend the voter registration deadline, which passed on February 18, to at most thirty days prior to April 28; the imposition of a multi-step, multi-mailing process for absentee voting; and the eliminated of in-person voting for all but a narrow set of voters.

Status:

 Complaint filed 3/30/20. Amended Complaint 3/31/20. 

Date Filed: March 20, 2020
State: Ohio
Issue: Improper Election Administration
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court For The Southern District Of Ohio (Case 2:20-cv-01638)

Issue:

 Challenge by Plaintiffs regarding the administration of the delayed primary based on the enactment of House Bill 197 (“H.B. 197”), including the refusal to extend the voter registration deadline, which passed on February 18, to at most thirty days prior to April 28; the imposition of a multi-step, multi-mailing process for absentee voting; and the elimination of in-person voting for all but a narrow set of voters.

Status:

 Complaint filed 3/30/20. Amended Complaint filed 3/31/20. Answer to amended complaint filed by intervenor defendant Ohio Republican Party 4/2/20. Answer to amended complaint filed by intervenor defendant Ohio Democratic Party 4/2/20. Opinion and order denying motion for preliminary injunction and denying motion for TRO 4/3/20. Stipulation of dismissal 4/20/20. 

Supreme Court of Ohio Documents

  • Complaint pdf file (3/30/20)
  • Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order And Proposed Order And Memorandum In Support pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit A pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit B pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit C pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit D pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit E pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit F pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit G pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit H pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit I pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit J pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit K pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit L pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit M pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit N pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Exhibit O pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Amended Complaint pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Order that Defendant Respond by 4/2/20 pdf file (3/31/20)
  • Motion To Intervene By Intervenor Defendant State Of Ohio pdf file (4/1/20)
  • Proposed Notice Of Defenses Of The State Of Ohio pdf file (4/1/20)
  • Order Granting The State Of Ohio's Motion To Intervene pdf file (4/1/20)
  • Motion To Intervene By Intervenor Defendant Ohio Democratic Party. pdf file (4/1/20)
  • ODP's Proposed Answer pdf file (4/1/20)
  • ODP Memorandum In Partial Support And Partial Opposition Of Plaintiff's Motion For TRO pdf file (4/1/20)
  • Exhibit A pdf file (4/1/20)
  • Motion To Intervene by Intervenor Plaintiff Libertarian Party Of Ohiopdf file (4/1/20)
  • Proposed Motion For Preliminary Relief By Intervenor Plaintiff Libertarian Party Of Ohiopdf file (4/1/20)
  • Motion To Intervene by Movant Ohio Republican Partypdf file (4/2/20)
  • Text Of Proposed Order Proposed Answer Of Intervenor-Defendant Ohio Republican Partypdf file (4/2/20)
  • Motion For Leave To File Instanter Amicus Brief Opposing Plaintiffs' Motion For Temporary Restraining Order By Amicus Honest Elections Projectpdf file (4/2/20)
  • Exhibit A Amicus Briefpdf file (4/2/20)
  • Exhibit B Proposed Orderpdf file (4/2/20)
  • Order Granting 25 Motion To Intervene; Granting 29 Motion To Intervene; Granting 32 Motion To Intervenepdf file (4/2/20)
  • Supplemental Memorandum Supporting Re 25 Motion To Intervene Memorandum Partially Supporting And Partially Opposing TRO Filed By Intervenor Defendant Ohio Democratic Partypdf file (4/2/20)
  • Motion For Leave To File Excess Pages State Of Ohios Motion For Leave To File Instanter The State Of Ohios Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion For Temporary Restraining Order In Excess Of Twenty Pages By Intervenor Defendant State Of Ohiopdf file (4/2/20)
  • # 1 Exhibit States Oppostion To TROpdf file (4/2/20)
  • # 2 Exhibit Declaration Of Former Governor Taftpdf file (4/2/20)
  • ># 3 Exhibit Declaration of Karla Herron And Pfeiffer, Julie (4/2/20)
  • Supplemental Memorandum Supporting Re 29 Motion To Intervene In Accord With Court Order Filed By Intervenor Plaintiff Libertarian Party Of Ohiopdf file (4/2/20)
  • Response In Opposition Re 4 Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order Filed By Movant Ohio Republican Partypdf file (4/2/20)
  • Response In Opposition Re 4 Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order Filed By Defendant Frank LaRosepdf file (4/2/20)
  • Exhibit #1 Advisory 2020-05pdf file (4/2/20)
  • Exhibit #2 Grandjean Declarationpdf file (4/2/20)
  • Exhibit #3 Directive 2020-06pdf file (4/2/20)
  • Exhibit #4 1_133-2644-1pdf file (4/2/20)
  • Answer To 5 Amended Complaint Filed By Intervenor Defendant Ohio Democratic Party.pdf file (4/2/20)
  • Memorandum in Partial Support And Partial Opposition To 4 Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order Filed By Intervenor Defendant Ohio Democratic Partypdf file (4/2/20)
  • Intervenor Complaint Filed By Intervenor Plaintiff Libertarian Party Of Ohiopdf file (4/2/20)
  • Answer To 5 Amended Complaint Filed By Intervenor Defendant Ohio Republican Partypdf file (4/2/20)
  • Brief By Amicus Honest Elections Projectpdf file (4/2/20)
  • Response In Opposition To 4 Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order Filed By Intervenor Defendant State Of Ohiopdf file (4/2/20)
  • Declaration of Former Governor Taftpdf file (4/2/20)
  • Declaration of Karla Herronpdf file (4/2/20)
  • Reply To Response To Motion Re 4 Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order, 31 Motion For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Intervenor Plaintiff Libertarian Party Of Ohiopdf file (4/3/20)
  • Motion For Leave To File Instanter Brief Of Amicus Curiae In Support Of Plaintiffs Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order By Amicus Disability Rights Ohiopdf file (4/3/20)
  • Exhibit A - Brief of Amicus Curiae Disability Rights Ohio In Support of Plaintiffs Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Orderpdf file (4/3/20)
  • Exhibit B - Proposed Orderpdf file (4/3/20)
  • Motion For Leave To File Excess Pages For Reply In Support Of TRO By Plaintiffs League Of Women Voters Of Ohiopdf file (4/3/20)
  • # 1 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum In Support Of TROpdf file (4/3/20)
  • # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - SOS Sixth Circuit Reply Brief in Mays v. LaRosepdf file (4/3/20)
  • # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Supplemental Declaration of Jen Millerpdf file (4/3/20)
  • Opinion And Order Denying 31 Motion For Preliminary Injunction; Denying 4 Motion For TROpdf file (4/3/20)
  • Brief by Amicus Disability Rights Ohiopdf file (4/3/20)
  • Reply To Response To 4 Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order Filed By Plaintiffs League Of Women Voters Of Ohiopdf file (4/3/20)
  • Exhibit 1 - SOS Sixth Circuit Reply Brief In Mays v. LaRosepdf file (4/3/20)
  • Exhibit 2 - Supplemental Declaration Of Jen Millerpdf file (4/3/20)
  • Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal By Intervenor Plaintiff Libertarian Party Of Ohiopdf file (4/6/20)
  • Stipulation Of Dismissalpdf file (4/20/20)
  • Commentary

    Edward B. Foley

    Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test

    Edward B. Foley

    A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.

    more commentary...

    In the News

    Daniel P. Tokaji

    This is why US election ballots routinely go missing

    Professor Dan Tokaji was quoted in USA Today about the prevalence of missing election ballots.

     

    "Most of the time, it just goes unreported because it doesn't affect the result," Tokaji said. 


    more EL@M in the news...

    Info & Analysis

    Supreme Court Finds Partisan Gerrymandering Claims to be Non-Justiciable Political Questions

    In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion on Thursday determining that claims of partisan gerrymandering are political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts. The opinion resolved disputes originating in North Carolina and Maryland, in the cases of Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek.

    more info & analysis...