| Roberts | Stevens | Scalia | Kennedy | Souter | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does mid-decade redistricting create an inference of an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander, thereby demanding less other proof of unconstitutionality than would be required in a conventional beginning of the decade redistricting? | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| Is mid-decade redistricting a violation of one-person one-vote? | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Is the Court open to considering the possibility that a redistricting plan is an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander regardless of when in the decade it is adopted? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Is there now a judicially manageable standard for evaluating claims of partisan gerrymandering? | Not addressed | Yes | No | Not yet, maybe never | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Not Addressed |
| Do decennial census figures used in mid-decade redistricting violate one-person one-vote? | No | ? | No | No | No | No | No | ? | No |
| Is District 23, involving Latino voters in Laredo, invalid under the Voting Rights Act? | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Does the Texas plan involve an unconstitutional racial gerrymander under the doctrine of Shaw v. Reno? | Not addressed | Not addressed | No, Section 5 is a compelling interest | Not addressed | Not addressed | No, Section 5 is a compelling interest | Not addressed | Not addressed | Not addressed |
| Is District 24, involving African-American voters in Dallas-Fort Worth area, invalid under the Voting Rights Act? | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | ? | No |