Last Updated: October 16, 2014 at 9:15 AM
Kohls v. Martin
Case Information
Date Filed: April 16, 2014
State: Arkansas
Issue: Voter ID
Courts that Heard this Case: Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas Sixth Division (Case 60CV-14-1495); Supreme Court of Arkansas (Case CV-14-462)
Issue:
Whether state statute requiring voters to provide proof of identity before voting violates the Arkansas constitution.
Status:
Petition filed 4/16/14. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed 4/22/14. Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed 4/25/14. Defendants' Response to Motion to Quash filed 4/28/14. Defendant Martin's Answer filed 5/2/14. Defendants' Answer filed 5/9/14. Order on Preliminary Injunction filed 5/23/14. Defendants' Notice of Appeal filed 5/23/14. Appellant's Brief filed 7/3/14. Separate Appellants Brief filed 7/7/14. Appellee's Brief filed 8/11/14. Opinion finding that Voter ID law violates Arkansas Constitution filed 10.15.14.
Supreme Court Documents
- Appellants' Brief
(filed 7/3/14) - Separate Appellants' Brief
(filed 7/7/14) - Appellees' Brief
(filed 8/11/14) - Reply Brief of Appellants
(filed 8/25/14) - Reply Brief of Separate Appellants
(filed 9/2/14) - The People's First Voting Project Amicus Curiae Brief
(filed 9/4/14) - Pulaski County Amicus Curiae Brief
(filed 9/4/14) - Dr. DeBlack Amicus Curiae Brief
(filed 9/4/14) - NAACP Amicus Curiae Brief
(filed 9/4/14) - Opinion Finding Voter ID Law Unconstitutional
(filed 10/15/14)
Circuit Court Documents
- Petition
(filed 4/16/14)
- Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 4/22/14)
- Defendants' Motion for Shortened Time
(filed 4/22/14)
- Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Shorten Time
(filed 4/23/14)
- Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Shorten Time
(filed 4/24/14) - Letter to Court
(filed 4/25/14) - Plaintiffs' First Supplemental to Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 4/25/14)
- Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas
(filed 4/25/14)
- Defendants' Response to Motion to Quash
(filed 4/28/14)
- Plaintiffs' Second Supplement to Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 4/30/14)
- Plaintiffs' Reply to Motion to Quash
(filed 5/1/14)
- Letter to Court
(filed 5/1/14) - Defendants' Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 5/1/14)
- Defendant Martin's Answer
(filed 5/2/14) - Defendant Martin's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 5/2/14)
- Defendant's Answer
(filed 5/9/14) - Defendant's Objection to Entry of Plaintiffs' Proposed Order
(filed 5/15/14) - Order on Preliminary Injunction
(filed 5/23/14) - Defendants' Notice of Appeal
(filed 5/23/14)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...