Last Updated: January 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM
Conservative Party of New York State, et al., v. New York State Board of Elections, et al.
Case Information
Date Filed: September 14, 2010
State: New York
Issues: Voting Technology, Vote Dillution
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:10-cv-06923)
Issue:
Whether New York's policy of, when a voter selects the same candidate multiple times under multiple party affiliations, counting only the vote for the first party selected, and thus depriving the second party of credit for receiving a vote on their party, without notice to the voter, is unconstitutional.
Status:
Consent Decree Dismissing Case entered 9/8/11. Oral Argument Held on Motion to Dismiss 1/31/11. Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Law on Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed 2/3/11. Order Denying Motion to Dismiss entered 2/10/11. Civil Case Management Plan entered 3/1/11. Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Settlement entered 4/7/11. Order and Opinion Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 5/10/11. Consent Decree Dismiss Case filed (9/08/11)
District Court Documents
- Complaint
(filed 9/14/10) - Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(filed 10/1/10)
- Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (filed 10/8/10)
- Reply Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Injunction
(filed 10/14/10)
- Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(filed 11/8/10)
- Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant
(filed 11/22/10) - Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
(filed 11/23/10) - Reply Memorandum of Law on Motion to Dismiss
(filed 12/1/10) - First Amended Complaint
(filed 12/20/10) - Transcript of proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff (entered 1/6/11)
- Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
(filed 1/10/11)
- Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
(filed 1/18/11) - Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
(filed 1/24/11) - Oral Argument Held 1/31/11
- Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Law on Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
(filed 2/3/11) - Order Denying Motion to Dismiss [Explanatory Memorandum to Follow]
(entered 2/10/11) - Answer to Amended Complaint
(filed 2/18/11) - Civil Case Management Plan
(entered 3/1/11) - Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Settlement
(entered 4/7/11) - Letter Requesting Rescheduling of Settlement Conference
(filed 4/25/11) - Order and Opinion Denying Motion to Dismiss
(entered 5/10/11) - Consent Decree Dismissing Case
(filed 9/08/11)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...