Last Updated: September 10, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Callen v. Blackwell
Case Information
Date Filed / Ended: November 14, 2006 / January 12, 2009
State: Ohio
Issue: Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio (Case 06 CV 014411)
Issue:
Whether Ohio's use of Diebold and ES&S voting machines violate state law requirements for reliability, security, accuracy, verifiability, and accessibility.
Status:
Complaint filed 11/14/06; Motion to Dismiss filed 11/22/06; Answer filed 12/4/06. Motion to amend complaint granted 4/9/08. Continuance granted until 2/9/09 on 5/8/08. Dismissal by Plaintiff filed 1/12/09. Termination of Case entered 1/12/09. Strike Schedule Date (2/9/09) entered on 1/12/09.
Trial Court Documents
- Docket
- Complaint
(filed 11/14/06) - Case schedule
(filed 11/14/06) - Motion to Dismiss with Motion in Support
(filed 11/22/06) - Answer Of Defendant Miami County Board Of Elections
(filed 12/4/06) - Response to Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint
(filed 1/12/07) - Reply Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss
(filed 1/18/07) - Decision Entry Granting Non-Resident Counties' Motions to Dismiss
(entered 1/26/07) - Answer to Complaint
(filed 2/21/07) - Cuyahoga Election Review Panel Final Report 7/20/06
(filed 4/4/07) - Strike Schedule Date (scheduled for 1/2/08) (entered 10/25/07)
- Continuance granted until 1/10/08 (entered 10/25/07)
- AMENDED COMPLAINT(4/9/08)
- GRANTING MTN TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO CONFORM CAPTION & CONTENT TO THE RULINGS, DISMISSALS & FACTS & STIPULATION IN SUPPORT (4/9/08)
- MOTION TO DISMISS (filed 4/18/08)
- CONSENT TO MOVE OR PLEAD (filed 4/25/08)
- ORDER WITHDRAWING MTN TO DISMISS AND VACATE TRIAL DATE (entered 5/8/08)
- CONTINUANCE granted until 2/9/09 (entered 5/8/08)
- ORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICES FILED (filed 5/9/08)
- DISMISSAL by PLAINTIFF (filed 1/12/09)
- TERMINATE CASE (entered 1/12/09)
- Strike Schedule Date (scheduled for 2/9/09) (entered 1/12/09)


Commentary
Gerrymandering as Viewpoint Discrimination: A "Functional Equivalence" Test
Edward B. Foley
A First Amendment test for identifying when a map is functionally equivalent to a facially discriminatory statute.
more commentary...